In the market of dietary supplements, a low degree of certainty exists in the state of the science, coupled with not at all times understanding what’s in the product. Together these issues make weighing benefits/dangers troublesome and hinder the flexibility to guide evidence-primarily based practice selections. The authors sought to determine priorities and develop potential options to handle research gaps so that data disseminated, can ultimately, be relied upon, when making an attempt to make applicable and protected selections. Using a modified-Delphi process, 8 panelists reviewed proof, supplied from systematic assessment, on dietary complement components for brain health, and mind guard brain health supplement prioritized gaps recognized and Mind Guard brain health supplied potential options. Research gaps particular to dietary supplements research included the need for quality testing of merchandise, the question of bioavailability and absorption of substances, and optimum composition and Mind Guard brain health standardization of supplements below investigation. Other gaps related to populations studied